Comments
Richard Davies wrote: The UK has a good crop of technology pioneers in cloud computing - for example ElasticHosts, FlexiScale, Flexiant, OnApp - and also some strong government initiatives such as G-Cloud. We will have to see whether this kind of technical leadership converts into swift mass-market adoption or not.
Cloud Expo on Google News


2008 West
DIAMOND SPONSOR:
Data Direct
SOA, WOA and Cloud Computing: The New Frontier for Data Services
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Red Hat
The Opening of Virtualization
GOLD SPONSORS:
Appsense
User Environment Management – The Third Layer of the Desktop
Cordys
Cloud Computing for Business Agility
EMC
CMIS: A Multi-Vendor Proposal for a Service-Based Content Management Interoperability Standard
Freedom OSS
Practical SOA” Max Yankelevich
Intel
Architecting an Enterprise Service Router (ESR) – A Cost-Effective Way to Scale SOA Across the Enterprise
Sensedia
Return on Assests: Bringing Visibility to your SOA Strategy
Symantec
Managing Hybrid Endpoint Environments
VMWare
Game-Changing Technology for Enterprise Clouds and Applications
Click For 2008 West
Event Webcasts

2008 West
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Appcelerator
Get ‘Rich’ Quick: Rapid Prototyping for RIA with ZERO Server Code
Keynote Systems
Designing for and Managing Performance in the New Frontier of Rich Internet Applications
GOLD SPONSORS:
ICEsoft
How Can AJAX Improve Homeland Security?
Isomorphic
Beyond Widgets: What a RIA Platform Should Offer
Oracle
REAs: Rich Enterprise Applications
Click For 2008 Event Webcasts
SYS-CON.TV
Top Links You Must Click On


Cross-Domain JSON with Silverlight Avoids crossdomain.xml Restriction
One of Silverlight’s advantages over Flash is the relatively effortless interop with AJAX

Joshua Allen's Blog

One of Silverlight’s advantages over Flash is the relatively effortless interop with AJAX. The other day, I needed to mash up some JSON data from various sites, and found it pretty easy to use AJAX to circumvent the crossdomain.xml restriction.

Both Flash and Silverlight allow you to “mash up” data from other web sites, but only if that site has a crossdomain.xml policy file defined. This sucks if you are calling a service like FriendFeed, who can’t make up their mind.

If you’re doing pure AJAX, you can get around these cross-domain restrictions by using JSON. One of Silverlight’s advantages over Flash is the relatively effortless interop with AJAX. The other day, I needed to mash up some JSON data from various sites, and found it pretty easy to use AJAX to circumvent the crossdomain.xml restriction. In the next month or two, my team will release a simple library to make this generic, but in the meantime here is an explanation for anyone who is blocked:

Step 1: Call into JavaScript from Silverlight, passing the URL of the JSON API:

HtmlPage.Window.Invoke("injectScript", url);

Step 2: The JavaScript Function “injectScript” looks like this:

function injectScript(url) {

var head = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0];

var script = document.createElement(’script’);

script.type = ‘text/javascript’;

script.src = url;

head.appendChild(script);

};

Step 3: Have the JSON script call back to a function in your page called “callback”:

function callback(obj) {

var silverlight = document.getElementById("silverlight");

 

if (silverlight) {

silverlight.Content.Page.PassData(JSON.stringify(obj));

}

};

Step 4: The callback() JavaScript function passes the data into Silverlight, where it is loaded into a JsonObject:

[ScriptableMember]

public void PassData(string data)

{

JsonObject data = …

}

IMO, this code is cleaner and faster than the standard technique of creating a “WebRequest” from Silverlight. And of course, a WebRequest will fail if the crossdomain.xml is missing.

 

So, is this a security hole? No! All web browsers on the planet allow cross-domain access to JSON, and if JsonObject.Parse had a “url” parameter, we presumably wouldn’t need to check for crossdomain.xml. The current restrictions in Silverlight undoubtedly result from the fact that WebRequest doesn’t know whether its result is intended for Json, XML (which all web browsers restrict by default), or something else.

 

About Joshua Allen
Joshua Allen, an Evangelist at Microsoft, is also author of the "Better Life Through Software" blog.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

Interesting article. I would like to point out that calling across browser domains will not work in all browsers. Firefox will outright prevent this behavior, and IE will alert the user with a warning. The best way to call into a service that you can't control is to make a call into your server, and then inside you server code forward that call onto the service onto the seperate domain. So the call flow would like something like this:
Silverlight->ASP.NET Server->Service.
Fortunately this is pretty easy to do.

Uhh, how exactly is this really at all different from flash and externalinterface?

For instance, flash can easily make calls like:

ExternalInterface.registerCallback("flcallback",handleResponse);
ExternalInterface.call("injectScript", url);

and the flash actionscript response handler:

function handleResponse(str:String):void {
// do something with the string
}

and of course the javascript for "injectScript" is the same.

and the JS callback function:

function callback(obj) {
var fl = document.getElementById("myflash");
if (fl) {
fl.flcallback(JSON.stringify(obj));
}
}

----------------------------
I don't see how this is any functionally different? In fact, some parts of that I think are a bit more sensible than the SL version.

And btw... this is really (IMHO) not a good idea to circumvent appropriate server-side authorization mechanisms. The "crossdomain.xml" is really a powerful tool, and if a web2.0 service provider can't figure out how to publish a sensible one for mashups to use, then it's THEIR fault, not the fault of the security model.


Your Feedback
Edgar wrote: Interesting article. I would like to point out that calling across browser domains will not work in all browsers. Firefox will outright prevent this behavior, and IE will alert the user with a warning. The best way to call into a service that you can't control is to make a call into your server, and then inside you server code forward that call onto the service onto the seperate domain. So the call flow would like something like this: Silverlight->ASP.NET Server->Service. Fortunately this is pretty easy to do.
Kyle Simpson wrote: Uhh, how exactly is this really at all different from flash and externalinterface? For instance, flash can easily make calls like: ExternalInterface.registerCallback("flcallback",handleResponse); ExternalInterface.call("injectScript", url); and the flash actionscript response handler: function handleResponse(str:String):void { // do something with the string } and of course the javascript for "injectScript" is the same. and the JS callback function: function callback(obj) { var fl = document.getElementById("myflash"); if (fl) { fl.flcallback(JSON.stringify(obj)); } } ---------------------------- I don't see how this is any functionally different? In fact, some parts of that I think are a bit more sensible than the SL version. And btw... this is really (IMHO) not a good idea to circumvent appropriate server-side authorization mechanisms...
Enterprise Open Source Magazine Latest Stories . . .
Apache Deltacloud, the Red Hat-contributed ReSTful API that abstracts differences between clouds so services on any cloud can be managed – provided of course there’s a driver – has graduated from the Apache Foundation’s incubator and is now a full-fledged Top-Level Project (TLP). The...
With Cloud Expo 2012 New York (10th Cloud Expo) just four months away, what better time to start introducing you in greater detail to the distinguished individuals in our incredible Speaker Faculty for the technical and strategy sessions at the conference... We have technical and st...
AMD said late Tuesday that its chief sales officer Emilio Ghilardi had left the company and that CEO and president Rory Read is going to do his job while a replacement is sought. AMD didn’t say why Ghilardi left but it’s assumed Read wants his own people. Read is relatively new to th...
During the lifespan of M3 (Monitis Monitor Manager) there has always been something lacking – timers. M3 execution procedure was outlined in this previous article. The execution mentioned in the latter was a one-time-execution, whereas server monitoring requires periodic invocati...
Red Hat is putting its bought-in Gluster scale-out NAS storage technology, acquired in October, on the Amazon cloud. It’s styled Red Hat Virtual Storage Appliance for Amazon Web Services and other clouds are supposed to follow in short order.
A new episode of the screencast series is now available at the OpenNebula YouTube Channel. This screencast demonstrates the new easily-customizable self-service portal for cloud consumers. Its aim is to offer a simplified access to shared infrastructure for non-IT end users. The scree...
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021


SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE