Comments
bruce.armstrong wrote: Somebody just said it better than I did, and with more chops to say it: Open Letter to Mark Zuckerberg, Sheryl Sandberg & Facebook Mobile
Cloud Expo on Google News


2008 West
DIAMOND SPONSOR:
Data Direct
SOA, WOA and Cloud Computing: The New Frontier for Data Services
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Red Hat
The Opening of Virtualization
GOLD SPONSORS:
Appsense
User Environment Management – The Third Layer of the Desktop
Cordys
Cloud Computing for Business Agility
EMC
CMIS: A Multi-Vendor Proposal for a Service-Based Content Management Interoperability Standard
Freedom OSS
Practical SOA” Max Yankelevich
Intel
Architecting an Enterprise Service Router (ESR) – A Cost-Effective Way to Scale SOA Across the Enterprise
Sensedia
Return on Assests: Bringing Visibility to your SOA Strategy
Symantec
Managing Hybrid Endpoint Environments
VMWare
Game-Changing Technology for Enterprise Clouds and Applications
Click For 2008 West
Event Webcasts

2008 West
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Appcelerator
Get ‘Rich’ Quick: Rapid Prototyping for RIA with ZERO Server Code
Keynote Systems
Designing for and Managing Performance in the New Frontier of Rich Internet Applications
GOLD SPONSORS:
ICEsoft
How Can AJAX Improve Homeland Security?
Isomorphic
Beyond Widgets: What a RIA Platform Should Offer
Oracle
REAs: Rich Enterprise Applications
Click For 2008 Event Webcasts
SYS-CON.TV
Top Links You Must Click On


Intel To Copy Some More of AMD's Moves
There are times when it looks like AMD is running Intel's design department. This is definitely one of them

There are times when it looks like AMD is running Intel's design department. This is definitely one of them.

Intel disclosed Wednesday that it'll be following AMD down the path of squeezing its previously separate memory controller onto the processor die. Integrating the memory controller is supposed to reduce latency, and the performance boost helped AMD win market share from Intel.

The change is set for Intel's 45nm, eight-core, multithreaded (like 16) Nehalem generation set to debut next year, which already represents a shift in microarchitecture. Intel claims it will be the "the biggest leap" in design since the Pentium Pro in 1996.

Among other things it's supposed to abandon the often-criticized front-side bus in favor of some kind of interconnect widgetry like AMD's prized HyperTransport.

Intel is also going to put graphics into some of the Nehalem chips like AMD has said it would do since buying graphics processor house ATI for $5.4 billion. Apparently Intel's decision come complements of Apple.

Nehalem is supposed to really exploit high-k/metal gate 45nm process technology. It is also supposed to give Intel the ability to segment the market and design market-specific features into the chips. The cores will be different, not the chipsets.

The 32nm shrink of Nehalem has been code named Westmere and is due in 2010.

In the second half of this year Intel is supposed to start selling its first-generation 45nm, quad- and dual-core Penryn desktop, notebook and server chips that are supposed to be 25% smaller, maybe 45% faster and have roughly 50% larger caches than the company's current processors. They are still Core 2-based.

There are supposed to be six of them and they will be socket compatible with the MP Canelands due next quarter. Their power envelopes will remain the same as current chips: 65W, 95W and 130W.

Penryns will still have the front-side bus, but one that runs at 1,600MHz not 1,333MHz. They will also reported clock better than 3GHZ.

AMD, you will remember, forced Intel in doing a 64-bit x86 chip. It won't have 45nm chips until next year. It has, however, a quad called Barcelona coming out this year that it thinks Intel can't touch until Nehalem. But Barcelonas may be in short supply.

About Security News Desk
SYS-CON's Security News desk trawls the world of security for news of software, hardware, products, and services that seems likely to be of interest to infosec professionals and summarizes them for easy assimilation by busy IT managers and staff.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

Your article is wholly inflamatory. Do your research and you will find that Intel had an IMC design: it just did not productize it. You should also look at whom AMD ended up copying before it: notably Intel's ISA and Sun, IBM with IMC.

Next time, do a bit of research before posting such inflamatory headlines.

Your article is wholly inflamatory. Do your research and you will find that Intel had an IMC design: it just did not productize it. You should also look at whom AMD ended up copying before it: notably Intel's ISA and Sun, IBM with IMC.

Next time, do a bit of research before posting such inflamatory headlines.

You have no idea of the history of the industry. Intel was developing an IMC many years ago called Timna, a project that was scrapped. Its not as if Intel is copying an idea that AMD has pioneered. True, AMD came up with a product earlier but its hardly an original idea. At the same time, there are disadvantages to having an IMC that you dont seem to realize, so its hardly a panacea for all problems.

There are times when it looks like AMD is running Intel's design department. This is definitely one of them. Intel disclosed Wednesday that it'll be following AMD down the path of squeezing its previously separate memory controller onto the processor die. Integrating the memory controller is supposed to reduce latency, and the performance boost helped AMD win market share from Intel. The change is set for Intel's 45nm, eight-core, multithreaded (like 16) Nehalem generation set to debut next year, which already represents a shift in microarchitecture. Intel claims it will be the 'the biggest leap' in design since the Pentium Pro in 1996. Among other things it's supposed to abandon the often-criticized front-side bus in favor of some kind of interconnect widgetry like AMD's prized HyperTransport.


Your Feedback
barfly wrote: Your article is wholly inflamatory. Do your research and you will find that Intel had an IMC design: it just did not productize it. You should also look at whom AMD ended up copying before it: notably Intel's ISA and Sun, IBM with IMC. Next time, do a bit of research before posting such inflamatory headlines.
barfly wrote: Your article is wholly inflamatory. Do your research and you will find that Intel had an IMC design: it just did not productize it. You should also look at whom AMD ended up copying before it: notably Intel's ISA and Sun, IBM with IMC. Next time, do a bit of research before posting such inflamatory headlines.
ahmad wrote: You have no idea of the history of the industry. Intel was developing an IMC many years ago called Timna, a project that was scrapped. Its not as if Intel is copying an idea that AMD has pioneered. True, AMD came up with a product earlier but its hardly an original idea. At the same time, there are disadvantages to having an IMC that you dont seem to realize, so its hardly a panacea for all problems.
ISSJ News wrote: There are times when it looks like AMD is running Intel's design department. This is definitely one of them. Intel disclosed Wednesday that it'll be following AMD down the path of squeezing its previously separate memory controller onto the processor die. Integrating the memory controller is supposed to reduce latency, and the performance boost helped AMD win market share from Intel. The change is set for Intel's 45nm, eight-core, multithreaded (like 16) Nehalem generation set to debut next year, which already represents a shift in microarchitecture. Intel claims it will be the 'the biggest leap' in design since the Pentium Pro in 1996. Among other things it's supposed to abandon the often-criticized front-side bus in favor of some kind of interconnect widgetry like AMD's prized HyperTransport.
Enterprise Open Source Magazine Latest Stories . . .
Grid Dynamics, an eCommerce technology solutions company, and GridGain Systems, makers of an open source in-memory platform for Big Data processing, on Wednesday announced the expansion of their partnership which began in 2008. Grid Dynamics provides personalization and big data solut...
Before embarking on using open source cloud technology for your web property, a basic understanding of cloud, as it’s used in the industry, is essential. While there might be exceptions, here are the definitions. A software application delivered on the web instead of installing standa...
Private clouds solve many problems for enterprises and bring unique operational challenges along with them. There are dozens of companies of all sizes that will build you a private cloud and turn over the keys – then what? Trying to convert a traditional enterprise IT operations team t...
The networking industry has gone through different waves over last 30+ years. In the ’80s, the first wave was all about connecting and sharing; how to connect a computer to other peripheral devices and other computers. There were many players who developed technology and services to ad...
If your organization already uses virtualized infrastructure, you are well on your way to providing IT as a Service. But as businesses demand faster results in today’s competitive market, organizations look to gain more benefits from cloud computing than just virtualized infrastructure...
In this CTO Power Panel at the 10th International Cloud Expo, moderated by Cloud Expo Conference Chair Jeremy Geelan, industry-leading CTOs & VPs of Technology will discuss such topics as: Which do you think is the most important cloud computing standard still to tackle? Who should...
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021


SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE