Comments
yourfanat wrote: I am using another tool for Oracle developers - dbForge Studio for Oracle. This IDE has lots of usefull features, among them: oracle designer, code competion and formatter, query builder, debugger, profiler, erxport/import, reports and many others. The latest version supports Oracle 12C. More information here.
Cloud Expo on Google News

2008 West
DIAMOND SPONSOR:
Data Direct
SOA, WOA and Cloud Computing: The New Frontier for Data Services
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Red Hat
The Opening of Virtualization
GOLD SPONSORS:
Appsense
User Environment Management – The Third Layer of the Desktop
Cordys
Cloud Computing for Business Agility
EMC
CMIS: A Multi-Vendor Proposal for a Service-Based Content Management Interoperability Standard
Freedom OSS
Practical SOA” Max Yankelevich
Intel
Architecting an Enterprise Service Router (ESR) – A Cost-Effective Way to Scale SOA Across the Enterprise
Sensedia
Return on Assests: Bringing Visibility to your SOA Strategy
Symantec
Managing Hybrid Endpoint Environments
VMWare
Game-Changing Technology for Enterprise Clouds and Applications
Click For 2008 West
Event Webcasts

2008 West
PLATINUM SPONSORS:
Appcelerator
Get ‘Rich’ Quick: Rapid Prototyping for RIA with ZERO Server Code
Keynote Systems
Designing for and Managing Performance in the New Frontier of Rich Internet Applications
GOLD SPONSORS:
ICEsoft
How Can AJAX Improve Homeland Security?
Isomorphic
Beyond Widgets: What a RIA Platform Should Offer
Oracle
REAs: Rich Enterprise Applications
Click For 2008 Event Webcasts
SYS-CON.TV
Top Links You Must Click On


Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters
The fact is that the general public is still struggling with blogs and wikis, much less full blown architectures


I've been spending a lot of time lately with folks around the mid-Atlantic region and talking to them about Web 2.0.  I get the expected full spectrum of responses ranging from genuine interest and active enthusiasm to some outright hostility.  Part of it is where the Web 2.0 space is still: an elite niche of technologists with a growing wider awareness that's just beginning.

Most of us know that the technology industry and the Web are often far out ahead of the mainstream.  The fact is that the general public is still struggling with blogs and wikis, much less full blown architectures of participation and software as a service (to name just two aspects of Web 2.0).  Not sure about this?  Try sampling a few people at random and ask them what a blog is.  You will probably be surprised with the answers.  Nevertheless, I'm extremely sanguine about Web 2.0 and where it's headed (notwithstanding Bubble 2.0 type events like the RSS Fund assembling a massive $100 million warchest and using it with questionable judgement.)

While generally exciting and engaging by most accounts, one thing my public presentations on Web 2.0 don't seem to address is the value proposition to the average person or organization.  Why should they spend their valuable time to leverage Web 2.0 ideas, participate in Web 2.0 software, or even create new Web 2.0 functionality?
How exactly does taking the effort to do this become worthwhile?  That question doesn't seem to be asked often enough or generally articulated.  Web 2.0 is exciting enough in its own right to sustain lots of interest and buzz, but how does it translate to delivering tangible value to the world at large?

To address this, I've thought fairly long and hard, and come up with a starting point at least.  I've tried to create the most distilled, direct explanation of the benefits that Web 2.0 best practices can provide in using and building engaging, useful software on the Web. 


Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters


  1. The Focus of Technology Moves To People With Web 2.0.  One of the lessons the software industry relearns every generation is that it's always a people problem.  It's not that people are the actual problem of course.  It's when software developers naively use technology to try to solve our problems instead of addressing the underlying issues that people are actually facing.  Then the wrong things inevitably happen;  we've all seen technology for its own sake or views of the world which are focused much too little on where people fit into the picture. Put another way, people and their needs have to be at the center of any vision of software because technology is only here to make our lives and businesses better, easier, faster or whatever else we require.  Web 2.0 ideas have been successful (at least) because they effectively put people back into the technological equation.  This even goes as far as turning it on its head entirely and making the technology about people.  Web 2.0 fundamentally revolves around us and seeks to ensure that we engage ourselves, participate and collaborate together, and mutually trust and enrich each other, even though we could be separated by the entire world geographically.  And Web 2.0 gives us very specific techniques to do this and attempts to address the "people problem" directly.
  2. Web 2.0 Represents Best Practices.  The ideas in the Web 2.0 toolbox were not pulled from thin air.  In fact, they were systematically identified by what actually worked during the first generation of the Web.  Web 2.0 contains proven techniques for building valuable Web-based software and experiences.  The original Design Patterns book was one of the most popular books of its time because it at long last represented distilled knowledge of how to design software with ideas couched in a form that were reusable and accessible.  So too are the Web 2.0 best practices.  If you want to make software deliver the very best content and functionality to its users, Web 2.0 is an ideal place to start.
  3. Web 2.0 Has Excellent Feng Shui.  Yes, I'll get in trouble for stating it this way but I think it fits, here goes...  I'm a technologist by background and I don't buy into the new-agey vision of Web 2.0 that has sometimes been promulgated.  And I certainly don't believe that Web 2.0 has a "morality" as the famous Tim O'Reilly/Nicholas Carr debate highlighted.  However, as someone that has designed and built lots of software for two decades now, I have plenty of regard for the way the pieces of Web 2.0 fit together snugly and mutually reinforce each other.  Why does this matter?  It has to do with critical mass and synergy, two vital value creation forces.  Taken individually, Web 2.0 techniques like harnessing collective intelligence, radical decentralization, The Long Tail are quite powerful, but they all have a potency much greater than their simple sum and they strongly reinforce each other.  In fact, I'll go as far as to say that only "doing" parts of Web 2.0 can get you into some real trouble. You need a core set of Web 2.0 techniques in order to be successful and then the value curve goes geometric.  This is why the ROI of software built this way is so much greater.  Here's an earlier post that provides more detailed examples of why this is.
  4. Quality Is Maximized, Waste Is Minimized.  The software world is going through one of its cyclical crises as development jobs go overseas and older, more bloated ways of building software finish imploding as the latest software techniques become more agile and lightweight (sometimes called lean).  The guys over at 37Signals say it best...  Using Web 2.0 you can build better software with less people, less money, less abstractions, less effort, and with this increase in constraints you get cleaner, more satisfying software as the result.  And simpler software is invariably higher quality.
  5. Web 2.0 Has A Ballistic TrajectoryNever count out the momentum of a rapidly emerging idea.  For example, I'm a huge fan of Eric Evans' Domain Driven Design but it's so obscure that it will probably never get off the ground in a big way. There's no buzz, excitement, or even a general marketplace for it.  This is Web 2.0's time in the sun, deserved or not.  You can use the leviathan forces of attention and enthusiasm that are swirling around Web 2.0 these days as a powerful enabler to make something important and exciting happen in your organization.  Use this opportunity to seize the initiative, ride the wave, and build great software that matters.
Certainly there are other reasons why Web 2.0 is important and you're welcome to list them here, but I think this captures the central vision in a way that most anyone who is Web literate can grasp and access.

BTW, I will also use this moment to state that Web 2.0 is a terrible name for this new vision of Web-based people-centric software.  Except that is for every other name we have at the moment (for example, like "next generation of the Web").  So I will continue to use Web 2.0 until something better comes along.

OK, don't agree?  Please straighten me out.  Why does Web 2.0 matter (or not) to you?

Technorati: web2.0

About RIA News Desk
Ever since Google popularized a smarter, more responsive and interactive Web experience by using AJAX (Asynchronous JavaScript + XML) for its Google Maps & Gmail applications, SYS-CON's RIA News Desk has been covering every aspect of Rich Internet Applications and those creating and deploying them. If you have breaking RIA news, please send it to RIA@sys-con.com to share your product and company news coverage with AJAXWorld readers.

In order to post a comment you need to be registered and logged in.

Register | Sign-in

Reader Feedback: Page 1 of 1

This is a time of innovation, not definition.

SOA, Web 2.0 -- these are "attempts" to categorize things...things which are new and barely known.

I chafe at the bit when some bombastic know-it-all tells me about a buzzword that is going to be the ne plus ultra of it all.

In fact, these very terms, Web 2.0 and SOA -- are about "divergent" technologies, that allow for ever expanding technology types!

Trackback Added: The Web 2.0 Trinity: People, Data, and Great Software; I've still been absorbing all the terrific brainstorming that came out of SPARK last weekend. One of the key bits that was agreed upon by all almost immediately was the utter centrality of the user. I've been big believe of this since ear

Trackback Added: The Web 2.0 Trinity: People, Data, and Great Software; I've still been absorbing all the terrific brainstorming that came out of SPARK last weekend. One of the key bits that was agreed upon by all almost immediately was the utter centrality of the user. I've been big believe of this since ear

I sense a bit of hostility. Tough room. It's like watching Java programmer do comedy at a sysadmin convention.

In the good old days, the techincal people designed the web, and they built it.
Now, it will probably be the marketing and commercial people who will drive the design of the next generation 'web'.

The thing that worries me is that the people who write viruses, worms, spyware etc are *so* much more technically savy than the kind of people who are going to drive the next generation systems. Those guys & girls are going to have a field day.

Oh, I had really hoped that the one upside of the bubble bursting would be that people would finally see the leveraged synergistics of empowered, paradigm-shifting, buzzword groupthink, as the load of con-man fast talk it really is.

My rectum gets all in a bunch at the very concept that these out-of-the-box, emergent asshats will be once again squaring off for the mindshare of our collective intelligence, so that they can capture eyeballs to secure a solid ROI in their VC funding!

You know, you would think that after losing tons of money in the last dotcom bust, people would figure out that if you have to make up words to describe your idea, it probably isn't a very good one. It is funny to me how the most successful businesses out of the last buzzword feeding frenzy had descriptions like "You use it to find information" or "it is an auction, on the computer" or "you pay to see nude women, on the computer" or "you buy things, and they are shipped to you."

But no, now we have Web 2.0, and all the English mangling, linguistically garbage spewing, criminal bottom feeders who missed out on their last chance to bilk investors out of millions of dollars, will have another shot at it! And all the rest of us will have to hear all over again how we just "don't get it" because we lack the vision to see the future. Oh joy!

Yes my heads starts to spin when I read this stuff. My bullshit detectors go off too. But if someone with bags of money decides to start a dotcom 2.0 company in San Francisco and pay me $120,000 per year to go slap together a few applications, I'll pretend I believe.

I feel like I am reading Wired or Mondo 2000 circa 1997 when I read about Web 2.0.

Honestly, though, what novel and useful things have happened lately? The only thing I can think of is the potential that SVG (vector graphics) in mozilla offers. RSS, blogs, myspace, and most everything else I can think of just isn't exciting. VoIP has some potential. Wifi has done a lot, but I wonder if the rate of improvement in it will slacken. What else is there?

I think I'll stay with good old Internet (Web 1.3.55.89) for now, thanks.

Yes my heads starts to spin when I read this stuff. My bullshit detectors go off too. But if someone with bags of money decides to start a dotcom 2.0 company in San Francisco and pay me $120,000 per year to go slap together a few applications, I'll pretend I believe.

I feel like I am reading Wired or Mondo 2000 circa 1997 when I read about Web 2.0.

Honestly, though, what novel and useful things have happened lately? The only thing I can think of is the potential that SVG (vector graphics) in mozilla offers. RSS, blogs, myspace, and most everything else I can think of just isn't exciting. VoIP has some potential. Wifi has done a lot, but I wonder if the rate of improvement in it will slacken. What else is there?

I think I'll stay with good old Internet (Web 1.3.55.89) for now, thanks.

Everyone wants to be funding the next Google and is going to be suckered with this Web 2.0.

Hopefully it won't happen but this whole buzz stinks of another bubble beginning to expand quickly, sucking the whole industry into it before finally exploding with a lot of people holding a turkey at the end of it.

The technology and social aspects have their uses, but it's more evolutionary than revolutionary and should be used as such.

Web 1.0 - Documents
Web 1.5 - Documents + Web Applications that pretend to be documents
Web 2.0 - Documents + Web applications acting like the interactive applications they are

Web applications are now free from the "static document" paradigm that previous chained them down. The web is no longer pretending to be static. That's not to say Web 2.0 is "mature" by any means, but the groundwork as certainly been laid.

BTW - There are a bunch of concepts and methods here that truly are revolutionary. The more I use it and understand what it means, the more I think Web 2.0 is not a bad name, and may even be justified.

-Pete

Dion Hinchcliffe's SOA Blog: Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters. Most of us know that the technology industry and the Web are often far out ahead of the mainstream. The fact is that the general public is still struggling with blogs and wikis, much less full blown architectures of participation and software as a service (to name just two aspects of Web 2.0). Not sure about this? Try sampling a few people at random and ask them what a blog is. You will probably be surprised with the answers. Nevertheless, I'm extremely sanguine about Web 2.0 and where it's headed (notwithstanding Bubble 2.0 type events like the RSS Fund assembling a massive $100 million warchest and using it with questionable judgement.)

Dion Hinchcliffe's SOA Blog: Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters. Most of us know that the technology industry and the Web are often far out ahead of the mainstream. The fact is that the general public is still struggling with blogs and wikis, much less full blown architectures of participation and software as a service (to name just two aspects of Web 2.0). Not sure about this? Try sampling a few people at random and ask them what a blog is. You will probably be surprised with the answers. Nevertheless, I'm extremely sanguine about Web 2.0 and where it's headed (notwithstanding Bubble 2.0 type events like the RSS Fund assembling a massive $100 million warchest and using it with questionable judgement.)

Dion Hinchcliffe's SOA Blog: Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters. Most of us know that the technology industry and the Web are often far out ahead of the mainstream. The fact is that the general public is still struggling with blogs and wikis, much less full blown architectures of participation and software as a service (to name just two aspects of Web 2.0). Not sure about this? Try sampling a few people at random and ask them what a blog is. You will probably be surprised with the answers. Nevertheless, I'm extremely sanguine about Web 2.0 and where it's headed (notwithstanding Bubble 2.0 type events like the RSS Fund assembling a massive $100 million warchest and using it with questionable judgement.)


Your Feedback
jabailo wrote: This is a time of innovation, not definition. SOA, Web 2.0 -- these are "attempts" to categorize things...things which are new and barely known. I chafe at the bit when some bombastic know-it-all tells me about a buzzword that is going to be the ne plus ultra of it all. In fact, these very terms, Web 2.0 and SOA -- are about "divergent" technologies, that allow for ever expanding technology types!
web2.wsj2.com wrote: Trackback Added: The Web 2.0 Trinity: People, Data, and Great Software; I've still been absorbing all the terrific brainstorming that came out of SPARK last weekend. One of the key bits that was agreed upon by all almost immediately was the utter centrality of the user. I've been big believe of this since ear
web2.wsj2.com wrote: Trackback Added: The Web 2.0 Trinity: People, Data, and Great Software; I've still been absorbing all the terrific brainstorming that came out of SPARK last weekend. One of the key bits that was agreed upon by all almost immediately was the utter centrality of the user. I've been big believe of this since ear
bluestrain wrote: I sense a bit of hostility. Tough room. It's like watching Java programmer do comedy at a sysadmin convention.
mustafap wrote: In the good old days, the techincal people designed the web, and they built it. Now, it will probably be the marketing and commercial people who will drive the design of the next generation 'web'. The thing that worries me is that the people who write viruses, worms, spyware etc are *so* much more technically savy than the kind of people who are going to drive the next generation systems. Those guys & girls are going to have a field day.
lmlloyd wrote: Oh, I had really hoped that the one upside of the bubble bursting would be that people would finally see the leveraged synergistics of empowered, paradigm-shifting, buzzword groupthink, as the load of con-man fast talk it really is. My rectum gets all in a bunch at the very concept that these out-of-the-box, emergent asshats will be once again squaring off for the mindshare of our collective intelligence, so that they can capture eyeballs to secure a solid ROI in their VC funding! You know, you would think that after losing tons of money in the last dotcom bust, people would figure out that if you have to make up words to describe your idea, it probably isn't a very good one. It is funny to me how the most successful businesses out of the last buzzword feeding frenzy had descriptions like "You use it to find information" or "it is an auction, on the computer" or "you pay to see nu...
drwho wrote: Yes my heads starts to spin when I read this stuff. My bullshit detectors go off too. But if someone with bags of money decides to start a dotcom 2.0 company in San Francisco and pay me $120,000 per year to go slap together a few applications, I'll pretend I believe. I feel like I am reading Wired or Mondo 2000 circa 1997 when I read about Web 2.0. Honestly, though, what novel and useful things have happened lately? The only thing I can think of is the potential that SVG (vector graphics) in mozilla offers. RSS, blogs, myspace, and most everything else I can think of just isn't exciting. VoIP has some potential. Wifi has done a lot, but I wonder if the rate of improvement in it will slacken. What else is there? I think I'll stay with good old Internet (Web 1.3.55.89) for now, thanks.
drwho wrote: Yes my heads starts to spin when I read this stuff. My bullshit detectors go off too. But if someone with bags of money decides to start a dotcom 2.0 company in San Francisco and pay me $120,000 per year to go slap together a few applications, I'll pretend I believe. I feel like I am reading Wired or Mondo 2000 circa 1997 when I read about Web 2.0. Honestly, though, what novel and useful things have happened lately? The only thing I can think of is the potential that SVG (vector graphics) in mozilla offers. RSS, blogs, myspace, and most everything else I can think of just isn't exciting. VoIP has some potential. Wifi has done a lot, but I wonder if the rate of improvement in it will slacken. What else is there? I think I'll stay with good old Internet (Web 1.3.55.89) for now, thanks.
cyberdanx wrote: Everyone wants to be funding the next Google and is going to be suckered with this Web 2.0. Hopefully it won't happen but this whole buzz stinks of another bubble beginning to expand quickly, sucking the whole industry into it before finally exploding with a lot of people holding a turkey at the end of it. The technology and social aspects have their uses, but it's more evolutionary than revolutionary and should be used as such.
peterdaly wrote: Web 1.0 - Documents Web 1.5 - Documents + Web Applications that pretend to be documents Web 2.0 - Documents + Web applications acting like the interactive applications they are Web applications are now free from the "static document" paradigm that previous chained them down. The web is no longer pretending to be static. That's not to say Web 2.0 is "mature" by any means, but the groundwork as certainly been laid. BTW - There are a bunch of concepts and methods here that truly are revolutionary. The more I use it and understand what it means, the more I think Web 2.0 is not a bad name, and may even be justified. -Pete
SYS-CON Italy News Desk wrote: Dion Hinchcliffe's SOA Blog: Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters. Most of us know that the technology industry and the Web are often far out ahead of the mainstream. The fact is that the general public is still struggling with blogs and wikis, much less full blown architectures of participation and software as a service (to name just two aspects of Web 2.0). Not sure about this? Try sampling a few people at random and ask them what a blog is. You will probably be surprised with the answers. Nevertheless, I'm extremely sanguine about Web 2.0 and where it's headed (notwithstanding Bubble 2.0 type events like the RSS Fund assembling a massive $100 million warchest and using it with questionable judgement.)
XML News Desk wrote: Dion Hinchcliffe's SOA Blog: Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters. Most of us know that the technology industry and the Web are often far out ahead of the mainstream. The fact is that the general public is still struggling with blogs and wikis, much less full blown architectures of participation and software as a service (to name just two aspects of Web 2.0). Not sure about this? Try sampling a few people at random and ask them what a blog is. You will probably be surprised with the answers. Nevertheless, I'm extremely sanguine about Web 2.0 and where it's headed (notwithstanding Bubble 2.0 type events like the RSS Fund assembling a massive $100 million warchest and using it with questionable judgement.)
SOA Web Services Journal News Desk wrote: Dion Hinchcliffe's SOA Blog: Five Reasons Why Web 2.0 Matters. Most of us know that the technology industry and the Web are often far out ahead of the mainstream. The fact is that the general public is still struggling with blogs and wikis, much less full blown architectures of participation and software as a service (to name just two aspects of Web 2.0). Not sure about this? Try sampling a few people at random and ask them what a blog is. You will probably be surprised with the answers. Nevertheless, I'm extremely sanguine about Web 2.0 and where it's headed (notwithstanding Bubble 2.0 type events like the RSS Fund assembling a massive $100 million warchest and using it with questionable judgement.)
Enterprise Open Source Magazine Latest Stories . . .
@ThingsExpo has been named the Most Influential ‘Smart Cities - IIoT' Account and @BigDataExpo has been named fourteenth by Right Relevance (RR), which provides curated information and intelligence on approximately 50,000 topics. In addition, Right Relevance provides an Insights offeri...
The goal of Continuous Testing is to shift testing left to find defects earlier and release software faster. This can be achieved by integrating a set of open source functional and performance testing tools in the early stages of your software delivery lifecycle. There is one process ...
The cloud competition for database hosts is fierce. How do you evaluate a cloud provider for your database platform? In his session at 18th Cloud Expo, Chris Presley, a Solutions Architect at Pythian, gave users a checklist of considerations when choosing a provider. Chris Presley is a...
It’s hard to believe that it’s already 2017. But with the new year comes new challenges, new opportunities—and, of course—new software projects. One of the most important questions beginner, intermediate, and advanced coders all have to answer before they begin their next project is wh...
Some people worry that OpenStack is more flash then substance; however, for many customers this could not be farther from the truth. No other technology equalizes the playing field between vendors while giving your internal teams better access than ever to infrastructure when they need...
The explosion of new web/cloud/IoT-based applications and the data they generate are transforming our world right before our eyes. In this rush to adopt these new technologies, organizations are often ignoring fundamental questions concerning who owns the data and failing to ask for pe...
Subscribe to the World's Most Powerful Newsletters
Subscribe to Our Rss Feeds & Get Your SYS-CON News Live!
Click to Add our RSS Feeds to the Service of Your Choice:
Google Reader or Homepage Add to My Yahoo! Subscribe with Bloglines Subscribe in NewsGator Online
myFeedster Add to My AOL Subscribe in Rojo Add 'Hugg' to Newsburst from CNET News.com Kinja Digest View Additional SYS-CON Feeds
Publish Your Article! Please send it to editorial(at)sys-con.com!

Advertise on this site! Contact advertising(at)sys-con.com! 201 802-3021




SYS-CON Featured Whitepapers
ADS BY GOOGLE